Officers from Worcestershire Regulatory
Services (WRS) outlined enforcement activity since June 2024,
covering fly tipping, littering, dog fouling and untidy land, with
an increase in staffing to 1.5 full time equivalent (FTE) to
support Bromsgrove District Council (BDC) when WRS took over the
service delivery.
The key points included:
- Since June 2024, WRS had undertaken
environmental enforcement on behalf of the Council.
- Fly tipping volumes in Bromsgrove
were high compared to other districts.
- Successful enforcement relied
heavily on gathering admissible evidence.
- Intelligence led approaches were
used to identify hotspots and repeat offenders.
- A proposal was put forward to adopt
the WRS Environmental Crime Enforcement Policy.
- Approval was sought to allow Civil
Enforcement Officers to issue littering penalties from
vehicles.
After discussions, Members raised the
following questions:
Environmental Crime
Update
- Dog fouling offences reported for
investigation were discussed. Members requested clarity on the
reported offences for dog fouling within the District. – The
standard procedures were explained to Members which included
firstly establishing if the complaint was an offence, followed by
an initial warning to the perpetrator, and then escalation through
a Community Protection Warning (CPW), Penalty Charge Notice (PCN),
Fixed Penalty Notice (FPN), followed by possible court
proceedings.
- Clarification was sought for the
extra resource increase of .5 FTE to cover the BDC area and if this
would be sufficient to cover the role? – Members were
informed that the extra resource had been operating since June
2024, which was predominantly being used to assist with review of
camera footage, associated intelligence checks and to also
administer enforcement files. Members
noted that the team were working as hard as they could with the
resource available.
Littering from
vehicles
- If there were other local
authorities carrying out similar civil enforcement action to
compare work productivity? – Members noted Wychavon District
Council were carrying out similar enforcement action and it was
agreed that Officers would seek their expertise in this field of
work.
- If Closed-Circuit Television (CCTV)
could be used if the offence had not been witnessed by a Civil
Enforcement Officer? – Members noted that evidence from CCTV
and evidence from members of the public could be used if the claims
were supported by witness statements.
Members were also advised that the Team were using vehicle
registration numbers as another approach to gain evidence.
- What was defined as a hotspot, could
cameras be used in these particular areas and what were the costs?
– It was advised that hotspots were identified by volume,
severity and patterns of offending and camera deployment was
limited by theft and technical constraints. Therefore, cameras were deployed selectively due
to cost, theft risk and technical limitations.
- If an update could be provided on
the number of fly tips reported since January 2026 as reported?
– Members noted numbers were high due to the impact of
littering issues in neighbouring District, particularly within the
Birmingham City area, however, Officers were liaising with
Birmingham City Council to tackle these issues. Members also noted that trying to track down
individuals was becoming increasingly difficult, as offenders were
learning new ways to avoid detection.
- Members discussed and queried the
links between organised crime and fly tipping. – Members were
advised that fly tipping was increasingly linked to organised
criminal activity and required an intelligence led approach to
identify offenders, which was a lengthy process. Members noted the need to raise public awareness
of these organised crimes and their impact. It was also highlighted that the individual who
owned the waste was ultimately responsible for its disposal.
Residents were advised to verify waste carriers via the Environment
Agency register or the Council website.
- If recycling centre access
restrictions were contributing to fly tipping? - It was advised
that there was no clear evidence which currently linked fly tipping
directly to recycling centre restrictions.
RESOLVED that
the Envirocrime Update be noted.