The Principal
Conservation Officer presented the Local Heritage Action List
Quarterly Update for Member’s consideration.
The Board were
informed of progress on preparing
the lists and are still inviting nominations for all
areas.
Work on drafting the
lists for Lickey and Blackwell, Bromsgrove, Wythall and Bournheath
continued but had been reduced due to staff sickness and a rise of
Development Management work in January and February. It was hoped that the delay would allow the
Bromsgrove Society to contribute to the Bromsgrove list
also.
Following
consideration of the presentation, Members provided the following
comments:
- A Member
queried how the selection process for listings was co-ordinated and
requested if Lickey End and Norton could be a future consideration
of review, advising that some listed buildings were situated in the
area. – In response the Board
were informed that parishes were generally considered instead of by
ward area (apart from the Bromsgrove and Rubery areas) and the
Conservation Team had decided that Parishes/areas were selected in
alphabetical order for fairness. It was
advised that the Conservation Team were happy to receive any
nominations which would be banked, however, may not be reviewed
until the parish/area in which they are located is being
reviewed. However, a visit could
be arranged to provide a local listing information evening to
provide a talk on the allocation process.
- A Member
requested progress on the drafting of lists for Lickey and
Blackwell. – In response the Board were informed that lists
were being actively worked on and there had been discussions with
the Parish Council, albeit some time ago. They had also submitted
nominations.
- A Member
suggested if Aston Field could be considered. – Advice of how
to locate the nomination forms on the BDC Website was provided to
Members.
- When
reviewing Bromsgrove, was it solely the Town Centre for
consideration? – In response the group were advised that it
was not solely the Town Centre and that a list of the wards
included in the Bromsgrove area would be provided for
Members’ consideration.
- Were
further delays envisaged due to the rise in the Development
Management work? – In response Members were informed that the
work for the local plan was unpredictable, however, it was hoped
progress on the lists would improve with the impending return of a
staff member who had been on sick leave.
- Would
Rubery be a future consideration? – The Principal
Conservation Officer advised that Rubery could be a
consideration. It was highlighted that
the Cardinal Newman’s House had been
flagged for consideration which was within the District’s
jurisdiction, at a recent talk given by the Principal Conservation
Officer.
- A Member
raised concerns regarding Bilberry Hill Tearooms based in the
Cofton Parish, which had been gifted to Birmingham City Council but
had seemed reluctant to assist with the building’s
restoration. The building had
dilapidated and was in serious need of repair. It was requested if the building could be reviewed
by the Conservation Team. – The Board were advised that if
the building was in private ownership and not listed, it would be
difficult to assist. However, the
Conservation Team were aware that West Midlands Building
Preservation Trust had shown interest in the building, and if they
were prepared to take it on as a project, they would have access to
various grant monies to repair it. It was agreed that contact details would be
provided to Councillor A. Dale.
RESOLVED that the Local Heritage
Action List (Quarterly Update) by noted.