Agenda for Licensing Sub-Committee on Wednesday 28th April 2010, 10.00 a.m.

Agenda and minutes

Licensing Sub-Committee - Wednesday 28th April 2010 10.00 a.m.

Venue: The Council House, Burcot Lane, Bromsgrove. View directions

Contact: Pauline Ross 

Items
No. Item

52.

Appointment of Chairman for the meeting

Minutes:

RESOLVED that Councillor Mrs. R. Dent be appointed Chairman of the Sub-Committee for the meeting.

53.

Apologies for Absence

Minutes:

No apologies for absence were received.

54.

Declarations of Interest

Minutes:

No declarations of interest were received.

55.

Procedure

Minutes:

The Chairman opened the Hearing and introduced the Members of the Sub-Committee and officers present to the Applicant and other parties present.

 

The Chairman invited the other parties present to identify themselves, so that the applicant was able to satisfy himself that no person who may be a position to influence the Sub-Committee remained in the room when the Sub-Committee considered its decision at the conclusion of the Hearing.

 

The Chairman reminded all parties of the procedure to be followed during the Hearing and that those parties present could be represented by a legal representative at their own expense, or by a Ward Councillor.

56.

application for a premises licence in respect of Martins, 65-67 Broad Street, Bromsgrove pdf icon PDF 86 KB

Additional documents:

Minutes:

The Sub-Committee was asked to consider an application for a premises licence in respect of Martins, 65-67, Broad Street, Bromsgrove.  The application was subject to a Hearing in light of representations which had been made by a local resident and a local business near to the premises.  The basis of their representations related to an increase in anti social behaviour, noise nuisance and litter in a residential area.

 

The Licensing Assistant introduced the report and informed those present that Members of the Sub-Committee had carried out an announced Site Visit to the premises prior to the Hearing. 

 

The case for Martins was then put forward by Mr. D. Crank (Associate, DWF LLP).  He explained that Martin McColl Limited would be expanding the store in order to trade as a mini convenience store with additional staffing and that the premises would undergo a refit.  He was aware that no representations had been received from any of the Responsible Authorities and that the current manager had not been made aware of any concerns from local residents.  Although there was no formal store policy managers would deal with any concerns raised by local residents.  Mr. Crank confirmed that the store would operate a ‘Challenge 25’ policy and not a ‘Challenge 21’ policy as stated in the application.  Mr. Crank responded to questions from Members on the storage and security of alcohol stock and the removal of additional cardboard due to the increase in stock, following which representations were made by Councillor D. Pardoe and Mr. Godsall.

 

Having had regard to:

 

  • The licensing objectives set out in the Licensing Act 2003
  • The Council’s Statement of Licensing Policy
  • The guidance issued under section 182 of the Act
  • The application and representations made by the Applicant’s solicitor
  • The relevant representations made in writing and at the hearing by the Interested Parties

 

RESOLVED that the application for a premises licence for the sale of alcohol for consumption off the premises be granted as follows:

 

Sale of Alcohol for consumption OFF the premises

 

  • 06:00hrs -  22:00hrs Monday through to Sunday

 

Actual opening hours of the premises

 

·        06:00hrs – 22:00hrs Monday through to Sunday

 

 

 

 

 

The reasons for the Sub-Committee’s decision were as follows:

 

§         The Sub-Committee had considered the written representations and oral representation made on behalf of the applicant.

 

·        The Sub-Committee had considered the written representations and the oral representations of the Interested Parties and noted the concerns that had been raised with regard to the potential risk of litter and possible anti social behaviour.

 

·        The Sub-Committee noted that no representations had been made by any of the other Responsible Authorities.

 

·        Having visited the property the Sub-Committee noted the large amount of cardboard and empty boxes at the rear of the property and had noted the Applicant’s intention to increase the collection of such items.

 

·        The Sub-Committee was re-assured by the Applicant’s intention to install CCTV and to operate the “Challenge 25 Policy” as confirmed at the Hearing which was an amendment to the ‘Challenge 21  ...  view the full minutes text for item 56.